JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)November 23, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Impedimentos
  • Causal por interés en la actuación en el proceso por parte del compañero permanente del funcionario judicial
  • Finalidad
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Con el presente auto se declara que en el proceso de tutela de la referencia, el magistrado (E) Aquiles Arrieta Gómez se encuentra incurso en la causal de impedimento establecida en el numeral 1º del artículo 56 de la Ley 906 de 2004.

De manera consecuente, se acepta el impedimento formulado y se separa al mencionado magistrado del conocimiento del proceso cuyo impedimento se acepta.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. DECLARAR que en el proceso de tutela T-5.761.833 promovido por Leidy Johanna Carvajal Saenz y Nehemen Ezequiel Feghali Jabre contra Coomeva EPS, el magistrado (E) Aquiles Arrieta Gomez se encuentra incurso en la causal de impedimento establecida en el numeral 1o del articulo 56 de la Ley 906 de 2004 y, en consecuencia, se ACEPTA el impedimento formulado.
  2. SEGUNDO. SEPARAR al magistrado (E) Aquiles Arrieta Gomez del conocimiento del proceso correspondiente a la accion de tutela cuyo impedimento se acepta en los terminos de esta providencia.
  3. TERCERO. Contra esta decision no procede ningun recurso.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Gloria Stella Ortiz Delgado
Reporting justice
✓
Alberto Rojas Ríos
Magistrado
✓
Alejandro Linares Cantillo
Magistrado
✓
Aquiles Arrieta Gómez
Magistrado
✓
Gabriel Eduardo Mendoza Martelo
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Iván Palacio Palacio
Magistrado
✓
Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva
Magistrado
✓
Luis Guillermo Guerrero Pérez
Magistrado
✓
María Victoria Calle Correa
Presidente
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.